To delay kindergarten, or not to delay kindergarten: a new study tackles the question
USA Today has thrown a new log on the fire in the debate over whether delaying kindergarten is helpful to children. An article yesterday says nearly a million young children could have been misdiagnosed for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) because they’re simply too young to handle kindergarten.
The newspaper had exclusive access to a new study by Michigan State University, which found that younger kids in grades 5 and 8 tended to use Ritalin – the drug often prescribed for ADHD – more often than older kids in those grades. These findings will no doubt add fodder to the many parenting websites out there giving advice on whether to hold your child back from kindergarten to help them achieve in the long run.
This is certainly not the final word on the issue, however. While some studies have found that students do better on tests if they enter kindergarten later, others have found that delaying kindergarten can have detrimental effects on children. And as USA Today points out, often parents don’t have a choice: Preschool can be expensive, and kindergarten is free.
Survivor: Port St. Lucie, Florida
Or as USA Today’s Greg Toppo says in an email: “What not to do as a kindergarten teacher.” This teacher ought to be voted off the island. But, since the police determined what she did wasn’t a crime, she probably possesses the immunity idol.
Are We All on the Same Page?
USA Today the other day took note of initiatives from mayors that put books in the hands of preschoolers to encourage them to read. It seems that mayors are getting on board with the movement that to this point has featured governors in the highest profile roles. The piece reported that dozens of cities have citywide book clubs and reading selections. In Jacksonville, Florida; Longmont, Colorado, Charleston, South Carolina and other cities, the city and private funders are providing preschoolers with books. In Jacksonville, every four year old who wants one receives a backpack stuffed with a book, hand puppet, reading blanket, flashcards and other items. The story also pointed out that these programs are universal, meaning they don’t target just poor kids. My only quibble with the story is that it uses the terms “pre-K” and “child care” interchangeably. That may seem fussy but the two terms really carry quite different meanings.
Pre-K is Point 8 of a Ten Point Plan
Andy Rotherham of Eduwonk and Education Sector fame and Richard Whitmire, the highly respected USA Today editorialist on education (currently on leave), give presidential candidates a 10-point plan on education on the new The Politico website. Point Eight:
8. Open the door to pre-kindergarten education. Academically focused pre-kindergarten programs help close the racial and economic achievement gap. Such programs are expensive, but taxpayers actually recoup the money in savings down the road because these programs help keep kids out of special education and out of trouble.
USA Today was on top of it….
My earlier post on coverage of the new National Institute on Early Education Research report noted that journalists hadn’t picked up the “mo’ money, even mo’ kids’”angle. Should have checked USA Today’s coverage before I said that. Greg Toppo was all over it. See how he handled it here.
Toppo also noted the existence of a new website called savvysource.com, which offers parents a way to judge the quality of preschools in their communities. Toppo quotes the site’s founder as saying it is “kind of a combination of Zagat’s and Craigslist” for parents of young kids.
Follow-up: Look for letters in newspapers around the country from pre-k supporters. The advocacy group Pre-K Now which, like this blog, gets support from The Pew Charitable Trusts sees the AP story on the NIEER report as a hook for supporters to write to newspapers and demand more money to be spent to raise program quality.
